Report on the 5th Working group Meeting of the eProcurement
Ontology
This report is also available as DOCX, ODT and PDF
formats.
|
Project: |
eProcurement Ontology |
Meeting Date/Time: |
2018-03-28 14:00 – 15:00 |
|
Meeting type: |
5th Working Group Meeting |
Meeting Location: |
Videoconference Webex (849718949@ecwacs.webex.com) |
|
Chairperson: |
Natalie Muric |
Issue Date: |
2018-03-28 |
|
Meeting Agenda |
|
·
Presentation of the participants ·
Glossary feedback (Natalie Muric) ·
Expectations from WG (Virginia Gomariz) ·
Conceptual Data Model (Enric Staromiejski) ·
Preparation of the PoC (Enric Staromiejski) ·
Any other business |
|
List of Participants |
||
|
Attendee Name (present) |
Initials |
Organisation / Email |
|
Paul
BORODAY |
PB |
OCDS |
|
Laia
BOTA |
LB |
everis |
|
Patrizia
CANNULI |
PC |
IT
Consip |
|
Manuela
CRUZ |
MC |
OP |
|
Tim
DAVIES |
TD |
OCDS |
|
Maria
FONT |
MF |
everis |
|
Virginia
GOMARIZ |
VG |
everis |
|
Karolis GRANICKAS |
KG |
Open Contract
partners |
|
Oleksandra HORDIYENKO |
OH |
Quinta Group |
|
Natalie
MURIC |
NM |
OP |
|
Iryna ONISHCHUK |
IO |
Quinta Group |
|
Myroslav OPYR |
MO |
CTO of Quinta Group & OCDS in ProZorro |
|
Claude
SCHMIT |
CS |
OP |
|
Enric
STAROMIEJSKI |
ES |
everis |
|
Summary of Meeting |
|||
|
Presentation of
the Participants The participants of the meeting presented themselves (see list of
participants – in alphabetical order). Glossary
feedback and expectations from WG Currently, there is no feedback related to the Glossary. However, weekly
meetings will be set up to confirm the concepts and definitions. In addition, some technical meetings will
be set up to: ·
Review the
coherence in both technical and business points of view; ·
Review the
progress on design and implementation topics (e.g. n-ary relationships
between classes, model documents as classes, etc.). Conceptual data
model The working group was informed on the progress of the ePO v2.0.0
conceptual data model: 1.
Procurement
project was explained; 2.
The overview
and Procurement procedure; 3.
And the rest
of diagrams with more specific classes and properties as published on the
GitHub. Any questions related to the conceptual model should be added as issues
in the GitHub space. Preparation of
the PoC The methodology of the PoC development was presented. This includes the
actors involved in the development and their tasks. Working group members are requested to review the identified competency
questions. They were identified taking into account the objectives of “Use
case 1: transparency and monitoring”, and “Use case 4: Analysing eProcurement
procedures”: https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/wiki/Competency-Questions Future meetings
are planned: 27/04/2018 ·
Revision of the ontology, conceptual
model and design considerations 01/06/2018 ·
Revision of the ontology, OWL
implementation and results of the PoC The work to be presented in each meeting
will generally be made available for the working groups’ information
approximately one week before each meeting. The action points decided for the next
meeting are listed below. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Action Points (AP): |
|||
|
AP# |
Name Description |
Due
Date |
Who |
|
1 |
Setting up weekly meetings on the glossary with the
working group. |
06-04-2018 |
OP |
|
2 |
Setting up of technical meeting |
As necessary |
Everis and OP |
|
3 |
Review the identified competency questions |
16-05-2018 |
Working group members |
|
Proposed
Agenda for Next Meeting: |
Proposed Next Meeting
Date: |
2018/05/04 |
|
I.
Presentation of the participants II.
Conceptual Data Model III.
Evolution of the PoC IV.
Any other business |
||